Australia's National Landcare Program is popularly seen as a successful att
empt to address rural land degradation in a cooperative and coordinated man
ner. Involving everyone from community Landcare groups to the corporate sec
tor and government agencies, "landcare" is seen to have become something bi
gger than the program that spawned it. In lieu of convincing evidence that
Landcare has transformed agricultural practices in a demonstrably sustainab
le direction, this high level, of involvement is itself cited as a measure
of success. Such a view however, pays little attention to competing concept
ualization's of what "landcare" actually means, to the power relationships
between those involved, or to the multitude of other social projects in whi
ch those involved are engaged. The failure to address these issues masks th
e extent to which Landcare both contributes to the further intensification
of farming practices, and is used as a signifier of environmental and socia
l responsibility in the greening of the corporate images of its sponsors. B
y sponsoring Landcare initiatives companies gain licensed access to use of
the Landcare Australia logo and may position themselves as responsible corp
orate citizens, irrespective of the environmental effects of their own prod
ucts and manufacturing processes. A form of "green consumerism" is thereby
constituted through which consumption is directed not towards the products
of farmers attempting to produce more sustainably, but towards the companie
s that ostensibly support their efforts to do so.