Rp. Ertl et al., Immunochemical analysis of liver microsomal cytochromes P450 of the American alligator, Alligator mississippiensis, TOX APPL PH, 157(3), 1999, pp. 157-165
Ten antibodies raised against various mammalian and fish cytochromes P450 (
CYP) enzymes were used to probe the effects of xenobiotic pretreatment on l
iver microsomes of the American alligator, Alligator mississippiensis. Pret
reatment with phenobarbital (PB), 3-methyIcholanthrene (3MC), and PB plus 3
MC elicited significant induction of multiple CYP enzymes in alligator, as
detected by antibodies to CYP1A, CYP2B, CYP2C, CYP2E, CYP2K, and CYP3A. In
contrast to the rat, 3MC treatment induced alligator liver microsomes that
were immunoreactive with antibodies to CYP2 family enzymes. Induction of CY
P enzymes was not as apparent with the Aroclor 1254 (ARO), and 2,2',4,4' te
trachlorobiphenyl (TCB) pretreatment used; fewer CYP enzymes primarily dete
cted with antibodies against CYP2C or CYP2E were observed. Clofibrate (CLO;
80 mg/kg Days 1-4), markedly induced CYP4A in rat but this induction was n
ot apparent in alligator. A purified PE-induced alligator liver microsomal
CYP enzyme cross-reacted with several antibodies raised against CYP2 family
enzymes but did not cross-react with antibodies raised against other CYP f
amilies. This indicates the PB-inducible CYP in alligator shares some epito
pe homology with several CYP2-family enzymes from other animals. These expe
riments demonstrate the usefulness and limitations of using antibodies acro
ss phylogenetic classes. While indicating the presence of CYP enzymes that
have epitope homology with CYP1A, CYP2, CYP3 and CYP4 enzymes in alligator,
it remains to be established whether these CYP forms are alligator ortholo
gues of mammalian enzymes. In all cases, the relative abundance of alligato
r liver microsomal CYP as determined by immunoblot analysis appeared lower
than found in rat. The presence and induction of CYP indicated by immunoche
mical analysis, corroborated previously reported enzymatic studies of the s
ame microsomal preparations (Ertl et al., 1998a). Thus, increases in CYP pr
otein by the various inducers employed were paralled by the increases in CY
P enzyme-specific or selective activities, e.g., induction of CYP1A protein
corresponded with induction of EROD. (C) 1999 Academic Press.