Analysis of referral diagnoses in patients with normal coronary angiograms

Citation
A. Kirchgatterer et al., Analysis of referral diagnoses in patients with normal coronary angiograms, WIEN KLIN W, 111(11), 1999, pp. 434-438
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine
Journal title
WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT
ISSN journal
00435325 → ACNP
Volume
111
Issue
11
Year of publication
1999
Pages
434 - 438
Database
ISI
SICI code
0043-5325(19990604)111:11<434:AORDIP>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Background and aims: Angiography permits an evaluation of the morphology of the coronary artery, stratification of risk and optimal therapeutic manage ment in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). The sophisti cated apparatus, cost and invasiveness of the procedure necessitate well-co nsidered application of this method. In spite of an exact documentation of the patient's medical history and careful establishment of the indication, the results of angiography are often normal. Therefore, it appears importan t to analyse the referral diagnoses in patients with normal coronary angiog rams. Patients and methods: We studied 1000 consecutive patients (625 men, 375 wo men, mean age 63.1 years) who underwent coronary angiography at our institu tion from January to May 1998. All patients were included in the retrospect ive analysis of the referral diagnoses. Results: 875 patients (554 men, 321 women) were referred due to suspected C AD; 173 of these had normal angiographic findings (20%; 73 men, 100 women; mean age 58.4 years). The referral diagnoses were as follows: unstable angi na in 62 patients (36%), stable angina in 40 patients (23%), chest pain and pathological findings of non-invasive testing in 32 patients (19%), atypic al chest pain in 25 patients (14%), previous myocardial infarction and mult iple risk factors in 7 patients each (4 % each). Gender-related differences were remarkable. Only 73 of the 554 referred men (13%) had normal angiogra phic findings, whereas in women the rate of normal results was more than tw ofold higher, i.e. 100 of the 321 referred women (31%) had normal angiograp hic findings (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Among 875 patients referred to our catheter laboratory for cor onary angiography due to suspected CAD, normal angiographic results were do cumented in 20%. The high frequency of the referral diagnosis 'unstable ang ina' and 'pathological result of noninvasive testing' was as remarkable as the high proportion of women among patients with normal findings.