Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation before primary angioplasty reduces catheterization laboratory events in high-risk patients with acute myocardial infarction

Citation
Br. Brodie et al., Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation before primary angioplasty reduces catheterization laboratory events in high-risk patients with acute myocardial infarction, AM J CARD, 84(1), 1999, pp. 18-23
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00029149 → ACNP
Volume
84
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
18 - 23
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9149(19990701)84:1<18:IBCBPA>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
The benefit of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABC) before primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) for acute myocardial infarction in high-risk patients has not been well documented. Consecutive patients (n = 1,490) with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary PTCA from 1984 to 1997 were prospectively enrolled in an ongoing registry. Catheterization laboratory events occurred during or after intervention in 88 patients (5.9%), including ventricular fibrillation in 59 patients (4.0% ), cardiopulmonary arrest in 46 patients (3.1%), and prolonged hypotension in 33 patients (2.2%). Cardiogenic shock was the strongest predictor of cat heterization laboratory events (odds ratio [OR] 2.18, 95% confidence interv als [CI] 1.58 to 3.02) followed by low ejection fraction (<30%) (OR 1.51, 9 5% CI 1.06 to 2.15) and congestive heart failure (CHF) (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.0 1 to 2.07). IABC used before intervention was associated with fewer cathete rization laboratory events in patients with cardiogenic shock (n = 119) (14 .5% vs 35.1%, p = 0.009), in patients with CHF or low ejection fraction (n = 119) (0% vs 14.6%, p = 0.10), and in all high-risk patients combined (n = 238) (11.5% vs 21.9%, p = 0.05). IABC was a significant independent predic tor of freedom from catheterization laboratory events (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.79). These data support the use of IABC before primary PTCA for acute myocardial infarction in all patients with cardiogenic shock, and suggest that prophylactic IABC may also be beneficial in patients with CHF or depre ssed left ventricular function. (C) 1999 by Excerpta Medico, Inc.