Ef. Magann et al., Antenatal testing among 1001 patients at high risk: The role of ultrasonographic estimate of amniotic fluid volume, AM J OBST G, 180(6), 1999, pp. 1330-1334
OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to compare the accuracy of the amniotic fluid index
and the 2-diameter pocket technique with respect to accuracy in predicting
an adverse pregnancy outcome among patients at high risk undergoing antena
tal testing.
STUDY DESIGN: All women with high-risk pregnancies and intact membranes who
underwent antenatal testing during an 18-month period were prospectively e
nrolled. Ultrasonographic estimates of amniotic fluid volume were performed
by means of the amniotic fluid index and the 2-diameter pocket technique.
Relative risks with 95% confidence intervals and receiver operator characte
ristic curves were calculated for patients with an ultrasonographic estimat
e of oligohydramnios (amniotic fluid index of less than or equal to 5 cm or
2-diameter pocket of less than or equal to 15 cm(2)) versus normal fluid l
evel (amniotic fluid index of >5 cm or 2-diameter pocket of >15 cm(2)). Out
come variables studied were intrapartum and neonatal complications.
RESULTS: Among 1001 patients the mean (+/-SD) amniotic fluid index was 10.5
+/- 5 cm and the mean (+/-SD) 2-diameter pocket was 18.7 +/- 13.6 cm(2). S
ignificantly more patients (46%) were considered to have oligohy dramnios a
ccording to the 2-diameter pocket criteria than according to the amniotic f
luid index (21%, P <.0001, relative risk 1.7, 95% confidence interval 1.5-1
.8). No significant differences in the incidences of nonreactive nonstress
test results, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, cesarean delivery for fetal
distress, low Apgar scores, or infants with cord pH of <7.10 were observed
between the oligohydramnios and normal amniotic fluid groups (P>.05) when a
ssessed by relative risk with confidence interval and by receiver operator
characteristic curves.
CONCLUSIONS: Current ultrasonographic measurements with the amniotic fluid
index and the 2-diameter pocket technique are poor diagnostic tests to dete
rmine whether a patient is at high risk for an adverse peri natal outcome.