OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate our institutional experien
ce with planned cesarean hysterectomy.
STUDY DESIGN: In this retrospective case-control investigation of a 16-year
experience, 100 pregnant women who underwent planned cesarean hysterectomy
were compared with 37 patients who underwent cesarean delivery followed by
a hysterectomy performed within 6 months.
RESULTS: Women undergoing planned cesarean hysterectomy did not have any de
monstrable increase in intraoperative or postoperative complications when c
ompared with the cesarean delivery plus later hysterectomy group. Primarily
as a result of significantly reduced hospital stay and shorter total opera
tive time, there was a significant financial advantage associated with a si
ngle planned cesarean hysterectomy with respect to separate operations.
CONCLUSIONS: A policy to undertake planned cesarean hysterectomy for carefu
lly selected patients appeared to produce advantages without increasing ris
ks for these patients. Secondarily, it provided resident physicians the opp
ortunity to learn the operation with supervision and under controlled circu
mstances.