Management of descending aortic dissection

Citation
Ja. Elefteriades et al., Management of descending aortic dissection, ANN THORAC, 67(6), 1999, pp. 2002-2005
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY
ISSN journal
00034975 → ACNP
Volume
67
Issue
6
Year of publication
1999
Pages
2002 - 2005
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-4975(199906)67:6<2002:MODAD>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
Background. Experience with 100 consecutive patients with acute dissection of the descending aorta seen at the Yale Center for Thoracic Aortic Disease over a 10-year period is reported. Methods. Clinical records from the Yale Center for Thoracic Aortic Disease from 1988 to 1998 were analyzed. This computerized data base included infor mation regarding patients' demographics, history, presenting symptomatology , diagnostic imaging, early hospital course, treatment strategy, and long t erm follow up (office visits, echocardiography, computerized tomography, ma gnetic resonance imaging, and home phone calls). Results. The average size of the aorta at the time of dissection was 5.05 c m. Nine patients died (six of complications directly related to the thoraci c aorta). Sixty of the 91 surviving patients had a benign course, and 31 ha d a course complicated by rupture (8), vascular occlusion (17), early expan sion or extension (12), and continued pain (4); multiple complications were seen in some patients. Forty-two patients came to operation (22 early and 20 late): 32 direct aortic replacements, 6 fenestration procedures, and 4 t hromboexclusions, There were six postoperative deaths and six paraplegias. Clinical experience with the alternative procedures of fenestration and thr omboexclusion found both procedures safe and effective for selected categor ies of patients. Review of the literature indicated that direct aortic repl acement in the setting of acute descending aortic dissection continues to c arry a very high mortality (28%-65%) and paraplegia rate (30%-35%), leaving room for consideration of alternative procedures. Conclusions. We recommend a "complication-specific" approach to acute desce nding aortic dissection: medical management with "antiimpulse therapy" for uncomplicated acute descending dissections and surgical intervention for co mplicated dissections. Surgical therapy varies for the specific complicatio n: for rupture direct aortic replacement is recommended; for vascular occlu sion fenestration; and for acute expansion or impending rupture, direct aor tic replacement, with thromboexclusion as an option. Chronic descending aor tic dissection is treated according to general guidelines for descending ao rtic aneurysms, with operation for symptoms or enlargement > 6.5 cm. (C) 19 99 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.