Although quality assurance efforts have been integrated into many aspects o
f American health care, their value has been questioned. They can consume l
arge amounts of resources (monetary and/or temporal), calling into question
their cost-effectiveness. To improve the yield of quality assurance effort
s and limit their consumption of administrative resources, they need to be
focused on those aspects of the operation where improvement is needed or wh
ere errors are particularly problematic and costly. just as a quality assur
ance program needs to define the outcome required of the process being moni
tored, the outcome of the quality assurance process needs to be defined at
the outset; the simplest possible system should then be designed to capture
the necessary data to direct improvement. Although quality assurance effor
ts have been documented to yield substantial savings, their real payback is
provided through better control of an operation and more complete knowledg
e of the status of that operation.