Necessity of clinical information in surgical pathology - A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 771 475 surgical pathology cases from 341 institutions
Re. Nakhleh et al., Necessity of clinical information in surgical pathology - A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 771 475 surgical pathology cases from 341 institutions, ARCH PATH L, 123(7), 1999, pp. 615-619
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Research/Laboratory Medicine & Medical Tecnology","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Objectives.-To examine the frequency and nature of problems caused by inade
quate clinical data provided on surgical pathology requisition forms.
Design.-Participants in the 1996 Q-Probes voluntary quality improvement pro
gram of the College of American Pathologists were asked to document prospec
tively all surgical pathology cases with inadequate information. Inadequate
clinical information was defined as the pathologist's need for additional
clinical information before a diagnosis could be rendered, regardless of th
e amount of information already present on the requisition slip. Cases that
had no clinical information on a requisition slip were not counted if the
lack of history did not hinder diagnosis. The study concluded when 3 months
had elapsed or 40 surgical pathology cases were documented. The following
data were recorded for each case: anatomic site, type of procedure, nature
of disease, method of obtaining additional information, importance of obtai
ned information, and the length of delay in the final diagnosis.
Participants.-Three hundred forty-one laboratories, 322 of which were from
the United States.
Results.-A total of 5594 cases (0.73%) required additional clinical informa
tion for diagnosis (10th through 90th percentile range, 3.01% to 0.08%). In
stitutions with greater average occupied bedsize, a greater number of cases
accessioned per year, and a greater number of pathologists had a lower per
centage of cases with inadequate clinical data (P <.05). Sixty-eight percen
t of these cases had no delay in completion of a case, 16.2% had a delay of
1 day or less, and 15.1% of cases were delayed more than 1 day. In 59.4% o
f cases, the additional clinical information obtained confirmed the initial
diagnostic impression. In 25.1%, the information was not relevant to the p
athologic diagnosis. In 6.1% there was a substantial change in the diagnosi
s or a revised report was issued, and in 2.2% no additional information cou
ld be obtained. Specific anatomic sites that correlated with a higher rate
of changed diagnoses or revised reports in cases with inadequate informatio
n included the small bowel, the bronchus/lung, and the ovary. Resection spe
cimens were also significantly associated with a higher rate of changed dia
gnoses or revised reports when additional information was obtained, as were
malignant neoplasms and therapy-induced changes.
Conclusions.-This study establishes an aggregate rate of cases with inadequ
ate clinical information for diagnosis (0.73%) and documents the extent of
problems caused by inadequate clinical information. The criticality of appr
opriate clinical information provided to the pathologist is identified far
specific anatomic sites and disease processes and is reflected in changed d
iagnoses or revised reports.