Jj. Atherton et al., The role of diastolic ventricular interaction in abnormal cardiac baroreflex function in chronic heart failure, AUST NZ J M, 29(3), 1999, pp. 428-432
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Baroreflex abnormalities have been well documented in both patients with ch
ronic heart failure and experimental animal models of heart failure. These
abnormalities are associated with increased mortality and probably contribu
te to neurohumoral activation. While it is likely that several mechanisms c
ontribute to reduced baroreflex sensitivity, it has been difficult to expla
in why baroreflex control mechanisms during acute volume unloading in patie
nts with severe chronic heart failure should be directionally opposite to t
hose in normal subjects. Volume unloading normally causes a reduction in ba
roreceptor activity, and hence an increase in sympathetic outflow; however,
patients with chronic heart failure develop attenuated increases or parado
xical reductions in forearm vascular resistance, muscle sympathetic nerve a
ctivity, and noradrenaline spillover. It has been suggested that this proba
bly represents paradoxical activation of left ventricular (LV) mechanorecep
tors, but why LV receptors should behave in such a fashion has not been det
ermined.
In the setting of diastolic ventricular interaction, the filling of the lef
t ventricle is constrained by the surrounding pericardium and right ventric
le. In these patients, the reduction in right ventricular (RV) volume that
normally occurs during acute volume unloading allows for an increase in LV
end-diastolic volume (as opposed to the reduction in LV volume that normall
y occurs). We have demonstrated this to be important in some patients with
chronic heart failure, and observed that baroreflex control of forearm vasc
ular resistance was markedly impaired in these patients. We propose that th
e increase in LV volume that occurred during volume unloading would increas
e LV mechanoreceptor activity, and could therefore explain the paradoxical
reductions in sympathetic outflow. As discussed, this has important therape
utic implications.