Upper airway reactivity and upper respiratory tract infection: effect of nebulized lidocaine

Citation
Ap. Hall et al., Upper airway reactivity and upper respiratory tract infection: effect of nebulized lidocaine, BR J ANAEST, 82(6), 1999, pp. 857-860
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA
ISSN journal
00070912 → ACNP
Volume
82
Issue
6
Year of publication
1999
Pages
857 - 860
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-0912(199906)82:6<857:UARAUR>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Patients presenting for elective anaesthesia and surgery may be suffering w ith, or recovering from, a recent upper respiratory tract infection. Airway reflexes are heightened and these individuals may be more likely to suffer airway complications on administration of general anaesthesia. We have exa mined the effect of nebulized lidocaine on upper airway reflexes in such su bjects. Using dilute ammonia as a chemical stimulus to the upper airway, we measured upper airway reactivity in 15 volunteers (aged 22-43 yr) with sym ptoms of an upper respiratory tract infection for 4 days or less. The thres hold concentration of ammonia producing a brief reduction in inspiratory fl ow was determined. Measurements were made before and after administration o f a nebulized solution of 4% lidocaine 4 mi or saline. After a 2-h interval the procedure was repeated with the alternative solution. The order of adm inistration was randomized. The observer was blind to the solution given. A mmonia threshold was found to increase in subjects after nebulized lidocain e, from a median value of 327 (range 76-878) ppm to 878 (251-1620) ppm (P=0 .0007, Wilcoxon); there was no significant change after nebulized saline. A fter a convalescence period of at least 4 weeks, with no return of symptoms in the preceding 2 weeks, ammonia threshold was reassessed. It was found t o be increased in all 15 subjects. Comparison of the five different times o f measurement showed a highly significant difference (P<0.001, Friedman). S ubsequent analysis showed significant differences (P<0.05, Wilcoxon) betwee n convalescent ammonia threshold and both baseline and post-saline nebulize r values. There was no significant difference between convalescent and post -lidocaine ammonia threshold. We conclude that in adult subjects, nebulized lidocaine attenuated the heightened airway reflex sensitivity associated w ith symptoms and signs of upper respiratory tract infection.