The valuation of productivity costs due to premature mortality: A comparison of the human-capital and friction-cost methods for schizophrenia

Citation
R. Goeree et al., The valuation of productivity costs due to premature mortality: A comparison of the human-capital and friction-cost methods for schizophrenia, CAN J PSY, 44(5), 1999, pp. 455-463
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Psychiatry,"Clinical Psycology & Psychiatry
Journal title
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE
ISSN journal
07067437 → ACNP
Volume
44
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
455 - 463
Database
ISI
SICI code
0706-7437(199906)44:5<455:TVOPCD>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
Objective: To compare productivity-cost estimates for schizophrenia-related premature mortality in Canada in 1996 using the human-capital (HC) approac h and friction-cost (FC) method. Methods: The number of deaths directly attributed to schizophrenia was comb ined with the estimated number of deaths attributable to schizophrenia from suicide. These premature deaths were valued using 2 methods. 1) the tradit ional HC approach, based on "potential" lost output to normal age of retire ment, and 2) the FC method based on finding a replacement worker. Results: In 1996 there were 342 male and female preretirement deaths attrib uted to schizophrenia, directly or indirectly by suicide, in Canada. Most d eaths were in males (78%) and by suicide (97%). The productivity cost of th ese deaths was estimated to be $105 million using the HC approach but only $1.53 million using the FC method. Conclusions: Productivity-cost estimates from the HC approach are substanti ally higher than those obtained from the FC method (69 times higher). In ci rcumstances of unemployment, the NC approach is an overestimate of future p roductivity losses for premature mortality.