Pain relief after thoracoscopy (video-assisted thoracic surgery): patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with IV opioids vs. intercostal blocks or interpleural analgesia
R. Leger et al., Pain relief after thoracoscopy (video-assisted thoracic surgery): patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with IV opioids vs. intercostal blocks or interpleural analgesia, CHIRURG, 70(6), 1999, pp. 682-689
Systemic opioids and thoracic epidural analgesia are common techniques used
to provide post-operative analgesia following thoracoscopy (video-assisted
thoracic surgery). The aim of the present prospective randomised study was
to evaluate the efficacy of two less invasive analgesic techniques, interc
ostal blocks (ICB) and interpleural analgesia (IPA). After approval from th
e ethics committee and informed consent from the patients, 36 patients sche
duled for thoracoscopic surgery were randomly assigned to a group for posto
perative pain management: group ICE: intercostal blocks of the segments inv
olved with 5 mi 0.5 % bupivacaine at the end of surgery and 6 h later; grou
p IPA: interpleural analgesia with 20 mi 0.25 % bupivacaine applied every 4
h using a catheter placed during surgery near the apex of the interpleural
space; control group: IV-opiod-PCA with piritamide. Patients in the ICE an
d TPA groups had access to pain relief by PCA with piritramide as well. Add
itional medication for all groups if the analgesia was insufficient consist
ed of metamizol. There were no significant differences in piritramide consu
mption between the two regional analgesia groups and the control group up t
o the 3rd and 7th postoperative day. Up to the 7th day piritramide consumpt
ion in group ICE was 78 mg, in group IPA 75 mg and 80 mg in the control gro
up. Patients in group ICE showed significantly less pain at rest measured b
y the visual analogue scale (VAS) on the Ist postoperative day (U-test, P <
0.05), but otherwise there were no statistical differences regarding pain
scores. Respiratory parameters such as forced vital capacity, forced expira
tory volume, peak flow and the Tiffeneau test (FVC,FEV1, PF, FEV1/FVC) were
reduced significantly after thoracoscopy and showed a slow recovery in all
three groups without significant intergroup differences. Thoracoscopic sur
gery causes less and shorter lasting pain in comparison to thoracotomy. Nev
ertheless, effective pain management is necessary. We could not demonstrate
a significant reduction in piritramide consumption for the techniques of r
egional analgesia tested here (ICB, IPA). We conclude that the use of these
techniques is not complementary after thoracoscopy, since an opioid (PCA w
ith piritramide) combined with a non-opioid (metamizol) resulted in satisfa
ctory analgesia.