V. Darrouzet et al., Xenogeneic ossicular implants: an experimental study of heterotopic, demineralized, lyophilized, porcine implants in the guinea-pig, CLIN OTOLAR, 24(3), 1999, pp. 190-197
This study was done to compare the outcome of porcine ossicular implants in
the middle ear and the subcutaneous dorsal region of the guinea-pig to tho
se of allo-implants implanted in parallel in the dorsal region. The implant
s were heteropic, xenogeneic, demineralized (HCl), lyophilized and steriliz
ed. The evaluation was histological (light microscopy and scanning electron
microscopy) and immunological (immunofluorescence staining). Fifty-four gu
inea-pigs were implanted in the middle ear and 14 of them were also implant
ed subcutaneously in the dorsal region with xeno-implants and alloimplants.
The middle ear implants were found to be constantly reossified and coated
with normal mucose with only a minimal immune reaction. In contrast, the do
rsal xeno-implants were found to be the target of mononucleic infiltration,
fibrous encapsulation and an influx of immunoglobulins resulting in segreg
ation. The corresponding allo-implants were found to be partially reoccupie
d and reossified. These findings highlight the value of HCl demineralizatio
n in the induction of non-species-specific Bone Morphogenetic Protein and t
he failure of attempts at immuno-despecification. It appears that the fate
of the implant depends less on its antigenic load than on the site of impla
ntation. In this regard the middle ear is apparently very advantageous. The
very good short-term tolerance and recovery observed in the middle car xen
o-implant suggest that these implants offer sufficiently good results to wa
rrant clinical testing.