Isothermal equilibrium adsorption of concanavalin A on dextran-modified poly(methyl methacrylate) latex particles

Citation
Cs. Chern et al., Isothermal equilibrium adsorption of concanavalin A on dextran-modified poly(methyl methacrylate) latex particles, COLLOID P S, 277(6), 1999, pp. 528-534
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Organic Chemistry/Polymer Science
Journal title
COLLOID AND POLYMER SCIENCE
ISSN journal
0303402X → ACNP
Volume
277
Issue
6
Year of publication
1999
Pages
528 - 534
Database
ISI
SICI code
0303-402X(199906)277:6<528:IEAOCA>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
Isothermal equilibrium adsorption experiments were carried out to study the adsorption of concanavalin A (Con A) on dextran-modified poly(methyl metha crylate) (PMMA) latex particles. Three PMMA particles with various levels o f dextran modification were selected for study: 0% (designated as DO), 1.24 % (D20), and 2.45% (D75) based on total polymer weight. The Langmuir model is applicable to both DO and D20 systems, although the data for the D20 sys tem are somewhat scattered. On the other hand, the amount of Con A adsorbed per gram polymer particles (q*) versus the Con A concentration in water (c *) curve for the D75 system cannot be described by the Langmuir model. The deviation is attributed to the formation of a crosslinked network structure , caused by specific binding of the dimeric Con A molecules onto two neighb oring particles with grafted dextran. The ratio of the initial number of Co n A molecules to the initial number of active binding sites on the dextran- modified particle surface plays an important role in determining the struct ure of flocs formed. The maximum amount of Con A adsorbed on the particle s urface (q(max)) is of the order of 10(-1) mu mol per gram particles and q(m ax) in decreasing order is D75 > D20 > DO. The dissociation constant of the Con A-D2O (or Con A-D75) pair is of the order of 10(-1) mu mol dm(-3) whic h is 1 order of magnitude smaller than that of the Con A-DO pair. Thus, the electrostatic interaction between Con A and DO is much weaker than the aff inity interaction between Con A and D20 (or D75). An empirical model is pro posed to qualitatively explain the q* versus c* data.