Widespread failure to comply with US storm water regulations for industry - Part II: Facility-level evaluations to estimate number of regulated facilities
Ld. Duke et Ka. Shaver, Widespread failure to comply with US storm water regulations for industry - Part II: Facility-level evaluations to estimate number of regulated facilities, ENV ENG SCI, 16(4), 1999, pp. 249-263
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology,"Environmental Engineering & Energy
This research evaluated compliance with U.S. pollution prevention regulatio
ns from storm water discharges associated with industrial activities, focus
ing on facilities that had failed to complete first-stage compliance requir
ements ("filed") approximately 5 years after the regulations took effect. T
he number of facilities is not readily estimated because the regulatory str
ucture requires facility-specific determination of requirement to comply ba
sed on factors not included in publicly available data. The research estima
ted the proportion of identifiable facilities actually subject to regulatio
ns using the universe of potentially covered California facilities develope
d in Part I of this research. Researchers mailed information to about 3,600
nonfiling facility operators to request they determine whether their facil
ities were included. Researchers then independently assessed inclusion for
several samples of about 200 facilities in the Los Angeles region. Results
suggested about half of the identified mandatory-compliance manufacturing f
acilities probably should comply, and at most half of those had filed throu
gh the first 5 years of the permit. The ability or willingness of facility
operators to correctly assess inclusion was limited; about one-fourth of fa
cility operators claiming nonapplicability were incorrect, and over one-thi
rd of contacted facilities failed to respond to mailings. Telephone intervi
ew techniques reliably assessed inclusion for many facilities but left unde
termined a large proportion of identified facilities. Field verification su
ggested over one-fourth of nonresponding facilities conducted industrial ac
tivities outdoors where pollutants were exposed to storm water, and were pr
obably subject to regulations, including a significant portion of facilitie
s whose coverage was undetermined by telephone methods.