The pharmacokinetics of carvedilol and its metabolites after single and multiple dose oral administration in patients with hypertension and renal insufficiency

Citation
Twb. Gehr et al., The pharmacokinetics of carvedilol and its metabolites after single and multiple dose oral administration in patients with hypertension and renal insufficiency, EUR J CL PH, 55(4), 1999, pp. 269-277
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology,"Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
ISSN journal
00316970 → ACNP
Volume
55
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
269 - 277
Database
ISI
SICI code
0031-6970(199906)55:4<269:TPOCAI>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Introduction: Carvedilol, a chiral compound possessing nonselective beta- a nd alpha(1)-blocking activity, is used for the treatment of hypertension an d congestive heart failure (CHF). The enantiomers of carvedilol exhibit sim ilar at-blocking activity; only S-carvedilol possesses beta-blocking activi ty. Carvedilol is primarily hepatically metabolized, with less than 2% of t he dose excreted renally as unchanged drug. Methods: The pharmacokinetics of carvedilol, R-carvedilol, and S-carvedilol were studied in hypertensive patients (control; n = 13) versus patients wi th hypertension and advanced renal insufficiency not yet on dialysis [GFR l ess than or equal to 30 ml . min(-1) (CRI, chronic renal insufficiency), n = 12] following single (12.5 mg, Day 1) and multiple (25 mg once daily, Day s 2-9) dosing. Results: Mean with (SD) AUC((0-24h)) (ng . h . ml(-1)) for carvedilol was 2 20 (120) and 618 (335) in CRI compared with 165 (83.5) and 413 (247) in con trols on Days 1 and 9, respectively, primarily due to higher R-carvedilol c oncentrations. Mean with (SD) C-max (ng . ml(-1)) for carvedilol were 53.4 (31.4) and 128 (63.3) in CRI compared with 46.7 (23.3) and 104 (58.9) in co ntrols on Days 1 and 9, respectively. The difference in group mean values w as characterized by considerable overlap in individual AUC((0-24h)) and C-m ax values between groups. There was no apparent difference in mean terminal elimination half-life for carvedilol between groups on each study day. Les s than 1% of the dose was excreted in urine as unchanged carvedilol in both groups. Blood pressure and heart rate declined in both groups to a similar degree. Conclusion: Compared with controls, average AUC((0-24 h)) values for carved ilol were approximately 40% and 50% higher on study Days 1 and 9 in patient s with renal insufficiency, primarily due to higher R-carvedilol concentrat ions with only a small change (<20%) in S-carvedilol concentrations, the is omer possessing beta-blocking activity. These changes in pharmacokinetics a re modest in view of the large interindividual variability. Carvedilol was well tolerated in both groups. Although the present study cannot provide a final conclusion, based on the results of the present study, no changes in dosing recommendations for carvedilol are warranted in patients with modera te/severe renal insufficiency.