The treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is one of mon controvers
ial aspects of pelvic floor surgery. The indications for the surgical appro
ach are related to the international classification as: Type 1 and Type 2 (
Anatomical Incontinence), and Type 3 urinary incontinence (Intrinsic Sphinc
teric Dysfunction). The procedure of choice for Type 1 and Type 2 is Bladde
r Neck Suspension (BNS) that create a strong hammock against which the uret
hra can be compressed with sudden changes of abdominal pressure. Type 3 has
to be treated by coaptation or compression of the deficient sphinteric uni
t (slings or injections). The mean cure rate after Marshall-Marchetti-Krant
z is 77%, that of the Burch is 81%, and that of the Needle Suspension is 79
%. Laparoscopy, Bone Anchors BNS and Tension-Free Vaginal Tape represent a
promising option to the traditional techniques. The contribution of minimal
invasive surgery consisting in: short recovery or possibility of day surge
ry, reduced trauma and pain, and success rate similar to the conventional t
echniques, is changing the SUI treatment. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ireland
Ltd. All rights reserved.