Matched 100- by 40-mm sawn lumber was dried in three kiln runs: run 1: dry
160/100 degrees C, steam 100/100 degrees C (high-temperature (HT) control);
run 2: dry 160/100 degrees C, pressure steam 130/130 degrees C; run 3: pre
ssure dry 160/130 degrees C, pressure steam 130/130 degrees C. Times for pr
essure drying and normal HT schedules were similar but pressure steaming re
quired only 1 hour compared to 3 hours at normal settings. The pressure tre
atments caused noticeable darkening but less residual stresses. Compared to
the HT control, normal HT drying/pressure steaming gave 25 percent lower t
wist and approximately one-third less rejection for twist in excess of pre-
set limits. Combined pressure drying/pressure steaming gave no improvement
in warp as compared to normal HT drying/pressure steaming. Machine stress g
rading indicated that the material subjected to both pressure drying and pr
essure steaming was approximately 12 percent stiffer compared to the HT con
trol material. However, small-clear results indicated that the material sub
jected to both pressure drying and pressure steaming was approximately 8 pe
rcent less stiff. Mean bending strength and mean compression strength were
not significantly affected. In conclusion, pressure treatments are unlikely
to have a noticeable effect on the strength of structural timber. The vari
ation in the structural timber properties due to defects such as knots, slo
ping grain, etc, should mask any effect caused by the pressure treatments.
It is concluded that pressure steaming after normal HT drying will signific
antly improve drying quality and the process could be easily implemented co
mmercially.