A. Lucchelli et al., Influence of fluoxetine and litoxetine on 5-HT4 receptor-mediated relaxation in the rat isolated oesophagus, FUN CL PHAR, 13(3), 1999, pp. 330-336
The influence of two selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), litox
etine and fluoxetine, has been studied on 5-HT4 receptor-mediated relaxatio
n in the rat isolated oesophageal muscularis mucosae, In carbachol-precontr
acted oesophageal tissues, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) (0.1 nM-l mu M) induc
ed concentration-dependent relaxations. Concentration-response curves were
monophasic and reproducible. Litoxetine at concentrations without antimusca
rinic properties (10 nM-1 mu M) caused concentration-dependent relaxations,
which reduced carbachol tone up to 37%. Higher litoxetine concentrations (
3 mu M-300 mu M) were associated with marked relaxation up to the abolition
of carbachol tone. The overall curve profile of litoxetine was biphasic in
nature with a high (10 nM-1 mu M) and a low (3 mu M-300 mu M) potency phas
e. Unlike 5-HT, the second curve of litoxetine was not reproducible, with a
reduction involving mainly the low potency phase. Compared to litoxetine,
fluoxetine caused minimal relaxation (less than 10% at 1 mu M). Treatment o
f rats with parachlorophenylalanine (pCPA: 375 mg kg per day, for two days)
, to deplete endogenous 5-HT stores, did not modify the relaxant effect of
5-HT, while it significantly reduced the high potency phase of litoxetine.
In tissues from untreated rats, this phase was reduced by the 5-HT4 recepto
r antagonist GR 125487 (10 nM) to an extent similar (P = 0.20: ANOVA fur co
ntinuous-by-class effects) to that induced by pCPA treatment. However, in t
issues from pCPA treated animals GR 125487 (10 nM) exerted a slight but sig
nificant antagonism of litoxetine response (P = 0.037: ANOVA for continuous
-by-class effects) mainly involving the high potency phase. In tissues from
untreated rats, litoxetine (1 mu M) increased the relaxant effects of 5-HT
, while in tissues from pCPA treated animals it exerted a small but signifi
cant depression of the maximal response to 5-HT, without changing its poten
cy value. Fluoxetine (1 mu M) slightly, but significantly, antagonized the
relaxant effect of 5-HT in an unsurmountable manner, In conclusion, litoxet
ine up to 1 mu M relaxed the rat isolated oesophageal muscularis mucosae th
rough a mechanism involving release of endogenous 5-HT, which in turn activ
ates 5-HT4 receptors. However, based on results with GR 125487 in tissues f
rom pCPA. treated rats, a small component of litoxetine-induced relaxation
may involve a direct activation of 5-HT4 receptors. It is unlikely that blo
ckade of 5-HT. reuptake can participate in the action of litoxetine, since
fluoxetine, a 5-HT reuptake inhibitor equipotent to litoxetine, was ineffec
tive in the same range of concentrations. The antimuscarinic activity of li
toxetine, previously demonstrated in the isolated guinea-pig intestine, pla
yed a role at concentrations greater than 1 mu M. The 5-HT-releasing action
of litoxetine could account For the potentiation by litoxetine of 5-HT-ind
uced relaxation in tissues from untreated rats, which was reversed by pCPA
treatment. Under these conditions, litoxetine depressed relaxations to high
5-HT concentrations only. In tissues from untreated rats, fluoxetine sligh
tly but unsurmountably antagonized 5-HT-induced relaxations, thus confirmin
g previous observations in the guinea-pig small intestine. (C) Elsevier, Pa
ris.