The epidemiology of migraine: A retrospective study in Italian emergency departments

Citation
Gf. De Carli et al., The epidemiology of migraine: A retrospective study in Italian emergency departments, HEADACHE, 38(9), 1998, pp. 697-704
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology
Journal title
HEADACHE
ISSN journal
00178748 → ACNP
Volume
38
Issue
9
Year of publication
1998
Pages
697 - 704
Database
ISI
SICI code
0017-8748(199810)38:9<697:TEOMAR>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
This study was conducted to measure the frequency of contact with emergency departments in Italy because of migraine, and to compare the initial diagn osis of headache with the diagnosis after application of the International Headache Society (IHS) criteria. A retrospective observational method was used, consisting of an analysis of the records of patients admitted to nine Italian emergency departments dur ing different 4-month periods in 1994. Comparison of the initial diagnosis with the diagnosis after application of the IHS diagnostic criteria was per formed. More than 31 million emergency department contacts were reported in Italy d uring 1994. In the same year, 543 630 patients visited the nine emergency d epartments enrolled in the study, with 169 569 of these contacts occurring in the 4-month period analyzed in the study. We excluded from the analysis all cases of secondary headache fully recognized at the emergency departmen t admission (ie, traumas, intracranial pathology systemic diseases). The to tal number of patients included in our analysis was 1043 (0.6%). The 934 pa tients who could be fully evaluated were initially classified as having mig raine; cluster headache; headache not otherwise specified; or diagnosed in the emergency department as suffering from headache, but reclassified by ot her departments as suffering from a different disease. After retrospective application of the IHS classification, the diagnostic distribution was modi fied, revealing that 18% of patients with migraine and 5% with cluster head aches had previously been classified as having headache not otherwise speci fied; a further 6% of cases with migraine and 0.4% of patients with cluster headache had previously been classified as having secondary headaches. The diagnosis of headache not otherwise specified was made with notable freque ncy, indicating the limits of emergency department logs and the difficulty in carrying out a retrospective analysis and reassessment of diagnosis. The majority (88%) of patients assessed had not taken drugs for headache in the 48 hours before the emergency department contact, suggesting that in I taly emergency departments are used instead of a visit to the general pract itioner. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were the most frequently pres cribed drugs in the emergency departments for this group of diagnoses. The research revealed, on the one hand, that headache is a numerically sign ificant phenomenon in the emergency department setting and, on the other, t he need to apply prospective designs to this kind of survey.