W. Plochl et al., The use of the antioxidant tirilazad mesylate in human liver transplantation: is there a therapeutic benefit?, INTEN CAR M, 25(6), 1999, pp. 616-619
Objectives:To test the hypothesis whether in patients undergoing liver tran
splantation the antioxidant tirilazad mesylate can reduce hepatic ischaemia
-reperfusion injury and improve postoperative outcome.
Design: Prospective, randomised, placebo controlled trial, Setting: Univers
ity hospital.
Patients: 20 patients were randomised to receive either tirilazad mesylate
or placebo (saline).
Interventions: Patients in the tirilazad group (n = 10) received four intra
venous infusions of tirilazad at 6-h intervals (men 3 mg/kg, women 3.75 mg/
kg) after the induction of anaesthesia, The ether patients (n = 10) served
as controls.
Measurements and results: Plasma levels of malonaldehyde (MDA) were determi
ned after the induction of anaesthesia prior to the infusion of tirilazad (
baseline), during the anhepatic period, and 5 min and 24 h after reperfusio
n. Postoperatively, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, p
rothrombin time, and serum cholinesterase were determined daily for 1 week.
Compared to baseline, plasma MDA levels did not significantly change durin
g the anhepatic period and after reperfusion and they did not differ betwee
n groups. postoperative liver enzymes and prothrombin time did not differ b
etween groups, but on the first (p = 0.03) and second (p = 0.01) postoperat
ive day cholinesterase levels were significantly higher in tirilazad-treate
d patients than in control patients. For neither length of Stay in the inte
nsive care unit nor hospital stay were any differences observed between gro
ups.
Conclusions: In patients undergoing liver transplantation, tirilazad does n
ot improve overall outcome. Whether the higher cholinesterase levels on the
first 2 postoperative days in tirilazad treated patients indicates an earl
ier recovery of liver function remains to be tested.