The aim of this study was to clarify the acute performance of steroid-eluti
ng screw-in lends in comparison with that of nonsteroid screw-in leads for
atrial free wall pacing. In 114 cases (68 males, 46 females, average age 70
years) with atrial free wall pacing by screw-in leads, pacing thresholds a
nd P-wave amplitudes were compared at the time of implantation and 1 week l
ater between 68 cases of nonsteroid and 46 cases of steroid-eluting screw-i
n leads. No significant differences were seen between the 2 groups at impla
ntation in either voltage or current thresholds measured at pulse widths of
0.1, 0.3, 0.6, 1.0, 2.0 ms, or P-wave amplitudes, Pulse width thresholds a
t outputs of 2.5 V and 5.0V were significantly lower for steroid leads 1 we
ek after implantation (2.5 V: 0.34+/-0.27 ms nonsteroid vs 0.12+/-0.08 ms s
teroid, p<0.001; 5.0V: 0.12+/-0.08 ms nonsteroid vs 0.06+/-0.02 ms steroid,
p<0.01). P-wave amplitudes after I week were significantly higher for ster
oid leads (2.6+/-0.7 mV nonsteroid vs 3.0+/-1.2 mV steroid, p<0.001. Thresh
old rise, including pacing failure, was observed in 15 (22%) of the nonster
oid lends, but in only 1 (2%) of the steroid leads. In conclusion, steroid-
eluting screw-in leads suppress the acute rise of pacing thresholds in the
right atrial free wall and their acute performance is better than that of n
onsteroid leads. Those results suggest that appropriate low-output atrial p
acing is feasible immediately after implantation.