ATRIAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL FEATURES IN PATIENTS WITH WOLFF-PARKINSON-WHITE AND ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION - ABSENCE OF RATE ADAPTATION OF INTRAATRIAL CONDUCTION TIME PARAMETERS
R. Riccardi et al., ATRIAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL FEATURES IN PATIENTS WITH WOLFF-PARKINSON-WHITE AND ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION - ABSENCE OF RATE ADAPTATION OF INTRAATRIAL CONDUCTION TIME PARAMETERS, PACE, 20(5), 1997, pp. 1318-1327
Clinical electrophysiology has not yet clearly defined atrial features
that can predict spontaneous occurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF).
The aim of this work was to identify atrial electrophysiological featu
res that can distinguish Wolff-Parkinson-White patients with spontaneo
us AF from those without this arrhythmia. Sixty-nine patients with Wol
ff-Parkinson-White were divided into three groups: group I (16 patient
s) with spontaneous AF; group II (35 patients) with reciprocating tach
ycardia but not AF; and group III (18 patients) asymptomatic without d
ocumented arrhythmias. Atrial effective refractory periods (ERPs) and
intraatrial conduction times in response to premature extrastimuli wer
e analyzed. The latter were evaluated as She A,A, interval min us the
correspondent S1S2 interval (A(1)A(2)-S1S2), S(2)A(2) and the interval
A(1)A(2) following the shortest S1S2 producing atrial activation (FRP
'). All the parameters have been evaluated in two atrial sites and at
two atrial pacing cycle lengths (600 and 400 ms). For all the paramete
rs, the difference (''gradient'') was calculated between the values of
the same parameter measured at the atrial pacing cycle length of 600
ms and that found at the atrial pacing cycle length of 400 ms in the s
ame recording site in each patient was calculated. Atrial ERP did not
differ significantly in the three groups. Intraatrial conduction param
eters, evaluated in the high right atrium (HRA), were longer when meas
ured at an atrial pacing of 400 ms and showed a lack of rate adaptatio
n in patients with spontaneous AF. In group I patients in particular,
FRP' became longer with the increase of atrial rate, while in groups 2
and 3, it usually shortened. The mean gradient of HRA FRP' was -15.0
+/- 19 ms in group I as compared to 5.7 +/- 13 ms in group II and 6.4
+/- 13 ms in group III (P < 0. 001); sensitivity, specificity and nega
tive predictive value of a negative gradient in the identification of
patients with spontaneous AF, were, respectively, 83%, 75%, and 93%. P
atients from groups 2 and 3 did not differ in any of the analyzed para
meters. Patients with Wolf-Parkinson-White and spontaneous AF showed p
rolonged intraatrial conduction times and a different behavior in resp
onse to modification of heart rate.