Introduction: New defibrillation techniques are often compared to standard
approaches using the defibrillation threshold. However, inference from thre
sholding data necessitates extrapolation from reactions to relatively ineff
ective shocks, an error prone procedure requiring large sample sizes for hy
pothesis testing and large safety margins for defibrillator implantation. I
n contrast, this article presents a clinically validated statistical model
of a minimum error, four-shock defibrillation testing protocol for estimati
ng the 80% effective defibrillation strength for a given patient (ED80).
Methods and Results: A Bayesian statistical model was constructed assuming
that the defibrillation dose-response curve is sigmoidal, and the ED80 is b
etween 150 and 750 V. The model was used to design a minimum predicted erro
r testing protocol and estimates. To prospectively validate the testing pro
tocol and estimates, 170 patients received voltage-programmed biphasic test
ing. Four fibrillation episodes were induced and terminated in each patient
according to the Bayesian up-down protocol. In addition, a validation atte
mpt was made at the estimated ED80 rounded up to the nearest 50 V. In order
to estimate the safety margin, in 136 patients, a defibrillation attempt w
as made at the rounded ED80 + 100 V, Of the 170 attempts at the rounded ED8
0, 143 (84%) attempts terminated fibrillation. Of the 136 attempts at the r
ounded ED80 + 100 V, 133 (98%) were effective.
Conclusions: The four-shock Bayesian up-down protocol is the first clinical
protocol to accurately predict an ED80 voltage. A 100 V increment above th
e ED80 provides an adequate safety margin. This simple and accurate method
for estimating a highly effective defibrillation dose may be a valuable too
l for population-based clinical hypothesis testing, as well as defibrillato
r implantation.