The citrus bud mite, Aceria sheldoni (Ewing), has a reputation as being a s
erious pest of lemons in California, although recent studies failed to reve
al a consistent economic impact. To resolve some previous inconsistencies,
we evaluated the economic value of treatments to suppress citrus bud mite p
opulations on a commercial scale over 3yr. Experiments were conducted in 6
groves and included 2 treatments of 100 trees each. In 1 treatment (treated
), trees were managed according to conventional commercial practices and in
cluded 1-2 annual applications of narrow-range oil to suppress citrus bud m
ite populations. In the other treatment (untreated), experimental trees wer
e managed identically as treated trees, except that oil spray applications
for citrus but mite were withheld. Bud mite density and incidence on experi
mental trees were monitored monthly, as were the number of fruit and the pr
oportion of distorted fruit. Fruit from all 100 trees in each treatment per
grove were commercially harvested, graded and packed. Crop volume, grade,
size distribution, and value were compared across treatments. Although oil
sprays effectively suppressed citrus bud mite populations, this yielded no
consistent benefit to crop volume, grade, or value. For all groves, the val
ue of fruit from treated trees was not significantly greater than that from
untreated trees, even before the cost of oil sprays was subtracted. In 4 o
f 6 cases, crop value was numerically lower in the treated treatment. Resul
ts suggest that the oil sprays themselves may have had deleterious effects
on fruit initiation and abortion, The potential phytotoxicity of oil sprays
, although long known, may not be fully considered in contemporary treatmen
t decisions for the citrus bud mite.