Postharvest sensory and physiochemical attributes of processing and nonprocessing tomato cultivars

Citation
M. Mohammed et al., Postharvest sensory and physiochemical attributes of processing and nonprocessing tomato cultivars, J FOOD QUAL, 22(2), 1999, pp. 167-182
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Food Science/Nutrition
Journal title
JOURNAL OF FOOD QUALITY
ISSN journal
01469428 → ACNP
Volume
22
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
167 - 182
Database
ISI
SICI code
0146-9428(199906)22:2<167:PSAPAO>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
Fruits of processing and nonprocessing tomato cultivars harvested at the "b reaker" stage of maturity were evaluated for changes in physical, chemical and sensory quality characteristics during storage at 20C and 30C after 7, 14 and 21 days. Percentage marketable fruits after 21 days at 20C and 30C w ere 61.9% and 56.6% for processing cultivars and 65.9% and 50.9% for nonpro cessing cultivars. Fruits of the processing cultivars ripened earlier, rema ined firmer and were less prone to physical injuries than fruits of nonproc essing cultivars. Nonprocessing fruits had a higher mean fruit weight of 17 .0 g fruit diameter of 1.10 mm and locule number of 1.3 compared with fruit s of the processing cultivars. Nonprecessing fruit cultivars had higher sug ar/acid ratios and vitamin C contents as well as lower pH and total titrata ble acidity than processing fruit cultivars. Accordingly, nonprocessing cul tivars on the whole, but specifically Waiters, Floradel, Carnival, Calypso, Star Pak, Floradade and Early Set were most suitable as fresh-market fruit s. Excellent processing quality attributes were obtained for Donore, Peto 9 4C, Rio Grande and Advantage. Among processing cultivars Caraibe, Cascade, Dorado and Neema 1401 gave good dual purpose fruits.