Reliability, criterion-related validity and qualitative comments of the Fourth Edition of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale with a young adult population with intellectual disability
Cm. Dacey et al., Reliability, criterion-related validity and qualitative comments of the Fourth Edition of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale with a young adult population with intellectual disability, J INTEL DIS, 43, 1999, pp. 179-184
The test-retest reliability and concurrent, criterion-related validity of t
he Fourth Edition of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale (SB-IV) were exa
mined in a young adult population with intellectual disability. Forty adult
s with mild to moderate intellectual disability (mean age = 20.8 years; SD
= 1.8 years) were administered the SE-IV and retested approximately 5 weeks
later (mean = 33.4 days, SD = 1.2). The Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale:
Interview Edition (VABS) was completed by a reliable informant within one w
eek of the SB-IV testing. The test-retest reliability coefficients for the
four SB-IV area and composite scores were all significant (P < 0.001). Indi
vidual subtest correlations tended to be lower but consistent across the tw
o administrations. Moderate correlations were observed between the VABS com
posite and SB-IV composite scores. The present results provide support for
the temporal reliability of the SB-IV and its concurrent, criterion-related
validity in an exceptional sample.