Reliability, criterion-related validity and qualitative comments of the Fourth Edition of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale with a young adult population with intellectual disability

Citation
Cm. Dacey et al., Reliability, criterion-related validity and qualitative comments of the Fourth Edition of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale with a young adult population with intellectual disability, J INTEL DIS, 43, 1999, pp. 179-184
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Rehabilitation,"Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH
ISSN journal
09642633 → ACNP
Volume
43
Year of publication
1999
Part
3
Pages
179 - 184
Database
ISI
SICI code
0964-2633(199906)43:<179:RCVAQC>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
The test-retest reliability and concurrent, criterion-related validity of t he Fourth Edition of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale (SB-IV) were exa mined in a young adult population with intellectual disability. Forty adult s with mild to moderate intellectual disability (mean age = 20.8 years; SD = 1.8 years) were administered the SE-IV and retested approximately 5 weeks later (mean = 33.4 days, SD = 1.2). The Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale: Interview Edition (VABS) was completed by a reliable informant within one w eek of the SB-IV testing. The test-retest reliability coefficients for the four SB-IV area and composite scores were all significant (P < 0.001). Indi vidual subtest correlations tended to be lower but consistent across the tw o administrations. Moderate correlations were observed between the VABS com posite and SB-IV composite scores. The present results provide support for the temporal reliability of the SB-IV and its concurrent, criterion-related validity in an exceptional sample.