Current use and timing of spinal surgery for management of acute spinal cord injury in North America: results of a retrospective multicenter study

Citation
Ch. Tator et al., Current use and timing of spinal surgery for management of acute spinal cord injury in North America: results of a retrospective multicenter study, J NEUROSURG, 91(1), 1999, pp. 12-18
Citations number
58
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology,"Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY
ISSN journal
00223085 → ACNP
Volume
91
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Supplement
S
Pages
12 - 18
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3085(199907)91:1<12:CUATOS>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
Object. A multicenter retrospective study was performed in 36 North America n centers to examine the use and timing of surgery in patients who have sus tained acute spinal cord injury (SCI). The study was performed to obtain in formation required for the planning of a randomized controlled trial in whi ch early and late decompressive surgery are compared. Methods. The records of all patients aged 16 to 75 years with acute SCI adm itted to 36 centers within 24 hours of injury over a 9-month period in 1994 and 1995 were examined to obtain data on admission variables, methods of d iagnosis, use of traction, and surgical variables including type and timing of surgery. A total of 585 patients with acute SCI or cauda equina injury were admitted to participating centers, although approximately half were ultimately excl uded because they did not meet inclusion criteria. Common causes for exclus ion were late admission, age, gunshot wound, and absence of signs of compre ssion on imaging studies. Thus, only approximately 50% of patients with acu te SCI would be eligible for inclusion in a study of acute decompressive su rgery. Although all patients underwent computerized tomography (CT) scannin g, only 54% underwent magnetic resonance imaging, and CT myelography was pe rformed in only 6%. Complete neurological injuries (American Spinal Injury Association Grade A) were present in 57.8%. Traction was applied in only 47 % of patients who sustained cervical injury, in whom decompressive traction was successful in only 42% of cases. Neurological deterioration occurred i n 8.1% of cases after traction. Surgery was performed in 65.4% of patients. The timing of surgery varied widely: less than 24 hours postinjury in 23.5 %, between 25 and 48 hours postinjury in 15.8%, between 48 and 96 hours in 19%, and more than 5 days postinjury in 41.7% of patients. Conclusions. These data indicate that although surgery is commonly performe d in patients with acute SCI, one third of cases are managed nonoperatively , and there is very little agreement on the optimum timing of surgical trea tment. The results of this study confirm the need for a randomized controll ed trial to assess the optimum timing of decompressive surgery in SCI.