Contrast effects as determined by the type of prime: Trait versus exemplarprimes initiate processing strategies that differ in how accessible constructs are used

Citation
Gb. Moskowitz et Iw. Skurnik, Contrast effects as determined by the type of prime: Trait versus exemplarprimes initiate processing strategies that differ in how accessible constructs are used, J PERS SOC, 76(6), 1999, pp. 911-927
Citations number
55
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
ISSN journal
00223514 → ACNP
Volume
76
Issue
6
Year of publication
1999
Pages
911 - 927
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3514(199906)76:6<911:CEADBT>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
In 4 experiments it was found that contrast effects in person perception de pend on the type and extremity of the primed information. Two previous mode ls of priming effects, the standard-of-comparison and the set-reset models, make opposing predictions for the consequences of prime extremity on contr ast effects. In Experiments 1 and 2 it was found that each model is descrip tively accurate but in response to different priming stimuli. Exemplar prim es (e.g., Dracula) produced greater contrast when extreme than when moderat e, a pattern consistent with the standard-of-comparison model. Trait term p rimes (e.g., malevolent) produced greater contrast when moderate than when extreme, which is consistent with the set-reset model. In Experiments 3 and 4 it was demonstrated that the mechanisms through which contrast is produc ed are distinct for the 2 types of primes. Standard-of-comparison contrast is more perceptual and is not disrupted by cognitive load; set-reset contra st is effortful and requires sufficient cognitive capacity.