Contrast effects as determined by the type of prime: Trait versus exemplarprimes initiate processing strategies that differ in how accessible constructs are used
Gb. Moskowitz et Iw. Skurnik, Contrast effects as determined by the type of prime: Trait versus exemplarprimes initiate processing strategies that differ in how accessible constructs are used, J PERS SOC, 76(6), 1999, pp. 911-927
In 4 experiments it was found that contrast effects in person perception de
pend on the type and extremity of the primed information. Two previous mode
ls of priming effects, the standard-of-comparison and the set-reset models,
make opposing predictions for the consequences of prime extremity on contr
ast effects. In Experiments 1 and 2 it was found that each model is descrip
tively accurate but in response to different priming stimuli. Exemplar prim
es (e.g., Dracula) produced greater contrast when extreme than when moderat
e, a pattern consistent with the standard-of-comparison model. Trait term p
rimes (e.g., malevolent) produced greater contrast when moderate than when
extreme, which is consistent with the set-reset model. In Experiments 3 and
4 it was demonstrated that the mechanisms through which contrast is produc
ed are distinct for the 2 types of primes. Standard-of-comparison contrast
is more perceptual and is not disrupted by cognitive load; set-reset contra
st is effortful and requires sufficient cognitive capacity.