Survival after cardiac arrest or sustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Citation
Pm. Elliott et al., Survival after cardiac arrest or sustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, J AM COL C, 33(6), 1999, pp. 1596-1601
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
ISSN journal
07351097 → ACNP
Volume
33
Issue
6
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1596 - 1601
Database
ISI
SICI code
0735-1097(199905)33:6<1596:SACAOS>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival of patients w ith hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) after resuscitated ventricular fibril lation or syncopal sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT/VF) when treated w ith low dose amiodarone or implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). BACKGROUND Prospective data on clinical outcome in patients with HCM who su rvive a cardiac arrest are limited, but studies conducted before the widesp read use of amiodarone and/or ICD therapy suggest that over a third die wit hin seven years from sudden cardiac death or progressive heart failure. METHODS Sixteen HCM patients with a history of VT/VF (nine male, age at VT/ VF 19 +/- 8 years [range 10 to 36]) were studied. Syncopal sustained ventri cular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation occurred during or immediately a fter exertion in eight patients and was the initial presentation in eight. One patient had disabling neurologic deficit after VT/VF. Before VT/VF, two patients had angina, four had syncope and six had a family history of prem ature sudden cardiac death. After VT/VF all patients were in New York Heart Association class I or II, three had nonsustained VT during ambulatory ele ctrocardiography and II had an abnormal exercise blood pressure response. A fter VT/VF eight patients were treated with low dose amiodarone and six rec eived an ICD. Prophylactic therapy was declined by two patients. RESULTS Mean follow-up was 6.1 +/- 4.0 years (range 0.5 to 14.5). Cumulativ e survival (death or ICD discharge) for the entire cohort was 59% at live y ears (95% confidence interval: 33% to 84%). Thirteen (81%) patients were al ive at last follow-up. Two patients died suddenly while taking low dose ami odatone, and one died due to neurologic complications of his initial cardia c arrest Three patients had one or more appropriate ICD discharges during f ollow-up; the times to first shock after ICD implantation were 23, 197 and 1,124 days. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that patients with HCM who survive an episode of VT/VF remain at risk for a recurrent event. Implantable cardioverter def ibrillator therapy appears to offer the best potential benefit regarding ou tcome. (C) 1999 by the American College of Cardiology.