Y. Yang et al., Analysis of yeast pms1, msh2, and mlh1 mutators points to differences in mismatch correction efficiencies between prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells, MOL G GENET, 261(4-5), 1999, pp. 777-787
Genetic stability relies in part on the efficiency with which post-replicat
ive mismatch repair (MMR) detects and corrects DNA replication errors. In E
scherichia coli, endogenous transition mispairs and insertion/deletion (ID)
heterologies are corrected with similar efficiencies - but much more effic
iently than transversion mispairs - as revealed by mutation rate increases
in MMR mutants. To assess the relative efficiencies with which these mismat
ches are corrected in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we examined repai
r of defined mismatches on heteroduplex plasmids and compared the spectra f
or >1000 spontaneous SUP4-o mutations arising in isogenic wild-type or MMR-
deficient (pms1, mlh1, msh2) strains. Heteroduplexes containing G/T mispair
s or ID heterologies were corrected more efficiently than those containing
transversion mismatches. However, the rates of single base-pair insertion/d
eletion were increased much more (82-fold or 34-fold, respectively) on aver
age than the rate of base pair substitutions (4.4-fold), with the rates for
total transitions and transversions increasing to similar extents. Thus, t
he relative efficiencies with which mismatches formed during DNA replicatio
n are repaired appear to differ in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. In add
ition, our results indicate that in yeast, and probably other eukaryotes, t
hese efficiencies may not mirror those obtained from an analysis of heterod
uplex correction.