The role of stable disease in objective response assessment and its impacton survival in advance colorectal cancer: Is "stable disease" a homogenousresponse category?
I. Popov et al., The role of stable disease in objective response assessment and its impacton survival in advance colorectal cancer: Is "stable disease" a homogenousresponse category?, NEOPLASMA, 46(2), 1999, pp. 132-139
Stable disease is a category which is not included in the evaluation of the
overall treatment response rate. Tn many studies with a response rate belo
w 20%, chemotherapy almost doubles the survival of patients. In the most ch
emotherapy trials with advanced colorectal cancer patients, about 30-50% ha
d stable disease. Despite belonging to the same category of therapy respons
e, some patients with stable disease have achieved symptom improvement, but
some have not. The aim of the study was to investigate whether the stabili
zation of the disease with clinical benefit is associated with benefit in s
urvival.
A total of 99 patients with advanced colorectal cancer were treated with ca
rboplatin (80 mg/m(2), day 1-7), 5-FU (750 mg/m2, day 1-5), leucovorin (100
mg/m(2), day 1-5) every 4 weeks. After 4 courses, in the: case of stable d
isease (SD), the patients were stratified according to clinical benefit ach
ievement in: Group A - patients with clinical benefit who continued with ch
emotherapy until 8 cycles or until disease progression; group B - patients
without clinical benefit in whom chemotherapy was stopped after 4 cycles. C
linical benefit was a composite of assessment of pain,. ECOG performance st
atus, weight and temperature. Clinical benefit required a sustained improve
ment in at least one parameter without worsening in any other.
Of 97 evaluable patients 48 achieved stable disease. Of 22 pts. with SD cli
nical benefit performance status improvement was recorded in 17, pain relie
f in 14, improvement in body weight in 14 and temperature disappearance in
8 pts. Of 26 pts. with SD without clinical benefit, 7 were asymptomatic fro
m beginning of the chemotherapy. No difference was detected in the survival
between responders and SD clinical benefit pts. (p = 0.24), but there was
significant difference between responders and SD pts. without clinical bene
fit (p = 0.0004). SD clinical benefit pts. had significant difference in su
rvival in comparison to pts. with progressive disease (p = 5.1 x 10(-6)).
The results of our study indicate that under category "stable disease" ther
e are two different subpopulations of patients with quite different symptom
response to chemotherapy, different time to progression and possible diffe
rent survival.