The aim of this study was to establish whether there is a link between sens
itisation to peanut and exposure to peanut oil in vitamin A and D preparati
ons. Forty-one children with a positive in vivo or in vitro test towards pe
anut were included. Twenty-one children had consumed vitamins A and D in oi
l solution, 14 in water solution, and 6 both types. Refined and unrefined p
eanut oils were obtained and skin prick test extracts were prepared. None o
f the children exhibited a positive SPT in response to the refined peanut e
xtract. In contrast, 15 children exhibited a positive SPT to the unrefined
extract. There was no significant difference in the number of children reac
ting clinically to peanut exposure who had received vitamins A and D in oil
-based or water-based formulations. However, children with clinical allergy
to peanut and who had exclusively consumed vitamin A and D in peanut oil,
exhibited a greater number of different allergic symptoms upon consumption
of peanut compared with clinical allergic children who had consumed the vit
amins in water solution or both types (p<0.01). This study indicates that s
ensitisation to peanut during childhood through consumption of vitamins A a
nd D in oil-based solution seems unlikely, but its consumption may contribu
te to the development of a wider range of clinical symptoms due to peanut e
xposure.