Aj. Williamson et A. Zunger, InAs quantum dots: Predicted electronic structure of free-standing versus GaAs-embedded structures, PHYS REV B, 59(24), 1999, pp. 15819-15824
Using an atomistic pseudopotential approach, we have contrasted the (i) str
ain profiles, (ii) strain-modified band offsets, (iii) energies of confined
electrons and holes, and (iv) wave functions and Coulomb interactions betw
een electrons and holes for three types of InAs quantum dots: (a) a free-st
anding spherical dot, (b) a GaAs-embedded spherical dot, and (c) a GaAs-emb
edded pyramidal dot. A comparison of (a) and (b) reveals the effects of str
ain, while a comparison of (b) and (c) reveals the effects of shape. We fmd
that the larger band offsets in the "free-standing" dots (i) produce great
er quantum confinement of electrons and holes and (ii) act to confine the w
ave functions more strongly within the dot, resulting in larger electron-ho
le Coulomb energies. The lower symmetry of the pyramidal dot produces a ric
her strain profile than the spherical dots, which splits the degeneracy of
the hole states and polarizes the emitted light.