Orthopaedic shoes are individually handmade after a prescription from an or
thopaedic surgeon, hence relatively expensive. Bad compliance is mentioned
in the literature but not investigated. In order to evaluate patient compli
ance and the effect of orthopaedic shoes, 85 patients who were prescribed o
rthopaedic shoes at the authors' department during a 3 year period received
a questionnaire concerning relief of symptoms and daily use of the shoes.
The answers from 74 patients were correlated to the prescription procedure
and the degree of medical follow-up.
Only 60 of 74 patients used their shoes. Some 51 patients had some benefit
while 23 had no effect or even worse symptoms. Some patients even used thei
r shoes despite no symptomatic relief. However, patients who felt they were
well informed about the purpose and function of their shoes had more benef
it than the rest. Only 12 patients of the 74 were checked by the orthopaedi
c surgeon after delivery of the shoes.
In conclusion the authors believe there is a great need for information to
be given to the patients about the functions and limitations of orthopaedic
shoes and that every patient should be offered a control check-up by the s
urgeon. Further investigations of the effect of orthopaedic shoes should be
carried out to optimise the use of these expensive devices.