C. Acebo et al., Estimating sleep patterns with activity monitoring in children and adolescents: How many nights are necessary for reliable measures?, SLEEP, 22(1), 1999, pp. 95-103
Study Objectives: This study provides estimates of reliability for aggregat
ed values from 1 to 7 recording nights for five commonly used actigraphic m
easures of sleep patterns, reliability as a function of night type (weeknig
ht or weekend night), and stability of measures over several months,
Design and Setting: Data are from three studies that obtained 7 nights of a
ctigraph data (using Mini Motionlogger actigraphs and associated validated
algorithms [ASA]) on children and adolescents living at home on self-select
ed sleep-wake schedules,
Participants: Participants were 169 children aged 12-60 months, and 55 adol
escents aged 11-16 years.
Measurements and Results: Up to 28% of weekly recordings may be unacceptabl
e for analysis in young participants because of illness, technical problems
and participant noncompliance; studies aiming to collect 5 nights of actig
raph data should record for at least 1 full week. Reliability estimates for
values aggregated over any 5 nights were adequate (greater than or equal t
o.70) for sleep start time, wake minutes, and sleep efficiency. Measures of
sleep minutes and sleep period were less reliable and may require 7 or mor
e nights for estimates of stable individual differences. Reliability for 1-
or 2-night aggregates were poor for ail measures. We found significant and
high correlations between summer and fall session measures for all five Va
riables when weekend nights were included.
Conclusions: Five or more nights of usable recordings are required to obtai
n reliable actigraph measures of sleep for children and adolescents.