Ambulatory assistive device use can improve functional independence followi
ng spinal cord injury and, potentially, quality of life. However, the inter
action between aids and user in this population is poorly understood.
Objectives: To determine the influence of walkers, crutches and canes on as
sisted-gait following incomplete spinal cord injury.
Study design/methods: Outcome parameters evaluated in ten individuals inclu
ded orthogonal forces exerted on instrumented assistive devices, walking sp
eed, cadence, step length, trunk and thigh angles, as well as knee and ankl
e joint angles. Kinetic data included axial compressive force, and medio/la
teral and antero/posterior bending forces. Setting: Canada.
Results: Results indicated that walkers (n = 5) provided the greatest verti
cal support (up to 100% body weight), but resulted in slow gait with a forw
ard flexed posture.. Elbow crutch users (n = 3) walked faster (greater step
length and cadence) and had a more upright posture than the walker users.
Crutches supported up to 50% of the subject's body weight, granted lateral
stability, and provided restraint in the antero/posterior direction. Canes
(n=2) offered restraining and propulsive assistance, some lateral stability
, and the least amount of vertical support.
Conclusion: Ambulatory devices affected posture and walking speed while ful
filling various assistive functions during locomotion. The conclusion drawn
is that rehabilitation specialists are advised to match device characteris
tics to user needs when prescribing walking aids.
Sponsorship: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, of Canada (
NSERC).