Development of the neck pain and disability scale - Item analysis, face, and criterion-related validity

Citation
Ah. Wheeler et al., Development of the neck pain and disability scale - Item analysis, face, and criterion-related validity, SPINE, 24(13), 1999, pp. 1290-1294
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology
Journal title
SPINE
ISSN journal
03622436 → ACNP
Volume
24
Issue
13
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1290 - 1294
Database
ISI
SICI code
0362-2436(19990701)24:13<1290:DOTNPA>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Study Design. The development and testing of a new comprehensive measure of neck pain and disability, the Neck Pain and Disability Scale. Objectives. To provide an initial evaluation of the Neck Pain and Disabilit y Scale's reliability and validity. Summary of Background data. Although several measures exist for generalized pain and disability, none is specific for neck pain. More specific measure ments should improve assessment of treatments and clinical research aimed a t cervical pain syndromes. Methods. The Neck Pain and Disability Scale was designed using the Million Visual Analogue Scale as a template and consists of 20 items that assess ne ck pain. In this study, 100 patients with neck pain, 52 patients with lower back and leg pain, and 27 pain-free volunteers were rated by the Neck Pain and Disability Scale. In addition, a subset of the 47 patients with neck p ain were rated by several other established psychometric instruments. Results. An item analysis showed a high degree of internal consistency amon g the 20 items on the Neck Pain and Disability Scale (r = 0.93), and face v alidity was established by comparing patients who had neck pain as well as lower back and leg pain with a pain-free group. The Neck Pain and Disabilit y Scale scores correlated with the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, the P ain Disability Index, and psychological measures of depression and neurotic ism. Conclusions. The results suggest a highly reliable instrument for evaluatin g neck pain with at least four underlying dimensions. Further work to addre ss the predictive validity of this new tool are under way.