COSMOLOGY USING CLUSTER INTERNAL VELOCITY DISPERSIONS

Citation
S. Borgani et al., COSMOLOGY USING CLUSTER INTERNAL VELOCITY DISPERSIONS, New astronomy, 2(2), 1997, pp. 119-138
Citations number
85
Categorie Soggetti
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Journal title
ISSN journal
13841092
Volume
2
Issue
2
Year of publication
1997
Pages
119 - 138
Database
ISI
SICI code
1384-1092(1997)2:2<119:CUCIVD>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
We compare the cumulative distribution of internal velocity dispersion s of galaxy clusters, N(>sigma(nu)), for a large observational sample to those obtained from a set of N-body simulations that we run for sev en COBE-normalized cosmological scenarios. They are: the standard CDM (SCDM) and a tilted (n = 0.85) CDM (TCDM) model, a cold+hot DM (CHDM) model with Ohm(nu) = 0.25, two low-density flat CDM (Lambda CDM) model s with Ohm(0) = 0.3 and 0.5, two open CDM (OCDM) models with Ohm(0) = 0.4 and 0.6. The Hubble constant is chosen so that t(0) similar or equ al to 13 Gyrs in all the models, while Ohm(b) = 0.02 h(2) is assumed f or the baryon fraction. Clusters identified in the simulations are obs erved in projection so as to reproduce the main observational biases o f the real data set. Clusters in the simulations are analysed by apply ing the same algorithm for interlopers removal and velocity dispersion estimate as for the reference observational sample. We find that a; f or individual model clusters can be largely affected by observational biases, especially for sigma(nu) less than or similar to 600 km s(-1). The resulting effect of N(>sigma(nu)) is rather model dependent: mode ls in which clusters had less time to virialize show larger discrepanc ies between intrinsic (3D) and projected distribution of velocity disp ersions. From the comparison with real clusters we find that both SCDM and TCDM largely overproduce clusters. We verified for TCDM that agre ement with the observational N(>sigma(nu)) requires sigma(8) = 0.5. As for the CHDM model, it marginally overproduces clusters and requires a somewhat larger sigma(8) value than a purely CDM model in order to p roduce the same cluster abundance. The Lambda CDM model with Ohm(0) = 0.3 agrees with data, while the open model with Ohm(0) = 0.4 and 0.6 u nderproduces and marginally overproduces clusters, respectively. (C) 1 997 Elsevier Science B.V.