Evaluation of indium-111 pentetreotide somatostatin receptor scintigraphy to detect recurrent thyroid carcinoma in patients with negative radioiodinescintigraphy
N. Valli et al., Evaluation of indium-111 pentetreotide somatostatin receptor scintigraphy to detect recurrent thyroid carcinoma in patients with negative radioiodinescintigraphy, THYROID, 9(6), 1999, pp. 583-589
The follow-up of patients who underwent thyroidectomy for differentiated th
yroid carcinoma is based on the combination of serum thyroglobulin (Tg) mea
surement and radioiodine total-body scan (ITBS). The diagnostic strategy to
be used in patients with elevated serum Tg level but negative ITBS remains
debatable. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) has been proposed. Our
objective was to compare the results of SRS and conventional radiological
imaging (CRI) for the diagnosis of recurrent disease and/or metastases in 1
5 patients who had had thyroidectomy for differentiated carcinoma (14 papil
lary, 1 Hurthle cell carcinoma) and who displayed elevated Tg levels (10 to
65000 ng/mL) together with negative ITBS performed after 100 mCi. All pati
ents underwent SRS and CRI within 3 months, allowing comparison of the 2 ap
proaches for the identification of thyroid carcinoma metastases. CRI first
included a chest x-ray and ultrasonography of the neck. It was followed by
computed tomography (CT) scanning and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) o
f the neck, chest and occasionally abdomen, and Tc-99m bone scintigraphy in
case of negative results. In 6 patients with Tg levels ranging from 65 to
65000 ng/mL, CRI detected 12 histologically proven metastases among 9 organ
s. Among these patients, SRS identified only 6 metastases. SRS identified 1
case of mediastinal recurrence that was not detected by CRI. In another pa
tient with a Tg level of 51 ng/mL, a cervical node was identified using bot
h SRS and CRI but proved to be a false-positive (inflammatory cervical node
). In the other 8 patients with Tg levels ranging from 10 to 580 ng/mL, SRS
and CRI were negative, and the source of Tg secretion remains unknown. The
results of SRS did not correlate with serum Tg level. In conclusion, the d
iagnostic accuracy of SRS in this study was disappointing and clearly lower
than that of CRT. Our results do not support the use of SRS as a guide con
ventional imaging modalities in patients operated on for differentiated thy
roid carcinoma who display elevated Tg levels together with negative ITBS.