Assessment of the chorioallantoic membrane vascular assay (CAMVA) in the COLIPA in vitro eye irritation validation study

Citation
Dm. Bagley et al., Assessment of the chorioallantoic membrane vascular assay (CAMVA) in the COLIPA in vitro eye irritation validation study, TOX VITRO, 13(2), 1999, pp. 285-293
Citations number
9
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO
ISSN journal
08872333 → ACNP
Volume
13
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
285 - 293
Database
ISI
SICI code
0887-2333(199904)13:2<285:AOTCMV>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
The chorioallantoic membrane vascular assay (CAMVA) is an alternative to th e Draize rabbit eye irritation method. The CAMVA employs the vascularized m embrane of a fertile hen's egg to assess eye irritation potential. This irr itation potential is a function of alterations in the vasculature following the administration of test material. Because of the history of use of the CAMVA it was selected as one of the methods for a validation study organize d and sponsored by COLIPA. For this validation study mathematical predictio n models (PMs) were developed to convert the CAMVA results into predicted D raize eye irritation scores known as a modified maximum average Draize scor e (MMAS). These predicted scores were statistically compared with the obser ved scores to assess the relevance of the CAMVA. The assay was conducted on the same set of test materials by two independent laboratories. These two sets of data were compared to assess the interlaboratory reproducibility of the assay. The results of this validation study of the CAMVA show that for test materials with MMASs in the 0 to 5 range or the 55 to 110 range, the CAMVA did not give a good prediction. The predictions were better for sampl es of mild to moderate irritation (MMAS 5-55). The difficulty in predicting at the low end of the irritation scale appears to be due to the biological variability of the test system and the subjective nature of the CAMVA eval uation. For those samples with an MMAS above 55, the CAMVA appeared to be l imited in demonstrating the more severe response. This may be due to the fa ct that the PMs were developed using historical data sets of test materials with MMASs below this range. Two approaches for improving the CAMVA for ey e irritation prediction are (1) to decrease the variability at the low end by reducing the subjectivity in the scoring and (2) to develop better predi ction models using more data in the range of severe irritants. (C) 1999 Els evier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.