Evaluation of secondary refinery effluent treatment using ultrafiltration membranes

Citation
Cc. Teodosiu et al., Evaluation of secondary refinery effluent treatment using ultrafiltration membranes, WATER RES, 33(9), 1999, pp. 2172-2180
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
WATER RESEARCH
ISSN journal
00431354 → ACNP
Volume
33
Issue
9
Year of publication
1999
Pages
2172 - 2180
Database
ISI
SICI code
0043-1354(199906)33:9<2172:EOSRET>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
This paper presents an evaluation of the possibilities of using ultrafiltra tion as a pre-treatment for reverse osmosis, in a double membrane filtratio n scheme, in order to recycle biologically treated refinery effluent as coo ling water make-up. This study focused on establishing the influence of pro cess conditions for ultrafiltration, i.e. pressure, duration of fouling, fr equency and duration of backwashing and chemical cleaning, on the rate of f ouling and process efficiency. Two ultrafiltration membranes provided by th e same manufacturer, made of polyethersulphone/polyvinylpirollidone, with t he same molecular weight cut-off (150,000 Da), but with different coatings have been used. A comparison between their experimental behaviour, under th e same process conditions, was made in a laboratory scale system operared i n dead-end mode, at constant transmembrane pressure, using as influent seco ndary refinery wastewater. The effect of reversible/irreversible fouling wa s studied by means of clean water flux restoration after different cleaning procedures. Experimental results showed that the A-LF (low fouling) membra ne was easy to clean by backwashing or enhanced backwashing, having a bette r flux restoration and a higher efficiency as production and operation than the A membrane. Average removal efficiencies of 98% for turbidity and TSS and 30% for COD h ave been obtained, for ultrafiltration tests, irrespective of process condi tions. The best chemical cleaning agents, considering the results of relati ve flux restoration, were found to be citric acid and sodium hydroxide. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.