Objective: 'Crisis cards' state patients' treatment details and preferences
in anticipation of a later occasion when the patient might be too ill to e
xpress them directly. We assessed the feasibility of introducing 'crisis ca
rds', or a collaborative form of them, 'joint crisis plans', into a sectori
zed community psychiatric service.
Method: All patients with a psychosis and at high risk of crisis were invit
ed to participate. Follow-up examined patients' satisfaction and how the ca
rds were used.
Results: In total, 106 eligible patients were identified and offered a card
, and 40% agreed to participate. Patients with an affective psychosis, past
suicide attempts and less frequent admissions were over-represented among
these who agreed to take part. Patients chose to include a wide range of in
formation. For participants, admissions fell by 30% in the follow-up year.
Conclusion: Crisis cards serve both a 'manifest', practical function (to pr
ovide important information when the patient is too ill to do so) and a 'la
tent' psychological one (positive effects on the patient's attitude to self
, their illness and treatment, and their relationship with the clinical tea
m).