R. Lauriks et al., A methodology for the description of border hedges and the analysis of variables influencing their distribution: a case study in western Kenya, AGROFOR SYS, 44(1), 1998, pp. 69-86
This paper presents results from a survey of border hedges on farmland in w
estern Kenya. The survey covered 160000 ha of high potential land in easter
n Siaya District and Vihiga District of western Kenya. The survey attempted
to widen the knowledge of the typology, the biomass and the parameters inf
luencing the spatial distribution of hedge types. Spatial analysis was used
to delimit hedge type sub-regions (using cluster analysis) and to identify
the variables influencing the spatial distribution of hedge types (using d
iscriminant analysis). It is demonstrated that a complex association of var
iables is influencing the subdivision of the two districts in hedge type su
b-regions in which ethnicity, population density, area in woodlots and ecol
ogical variables like elevation, rainfall and soil fertility are important
variables. These variables are influencing each other and are responsible f
or the contrasting situation in Vihiga and Siaya District. Border hedges ha
ve similar functions in both districts (demarcation of land, to prevent cat
tle from entering), nevertheless species composition and dimensions differ
remarkably in both districts. Border hedges in Siaya District are poorly ma
naged or not managed at all. In Vihiga District people are used to manage t
heir hedges. Agroforestry techniques, for example techniques based on frequ
ent pruning of border hedges, have a high chance in being successful in thi
s district because no additional investment in labour or time is required.
The spatial distribution in the amount of biomass is strongly correlated wi
th the distribution in the per cent area ground cover of border hedges. Thi
s means that secondary data on the area in hedges derived from aerial photo
graphs can serve as a useful indicator of the biomass present. As a result,
the most difficult part of the field survey, the destructive sampling for
the determination of the biomass, can be eliminated, making general surveys
considerably easier.