D. Sharpstone et al., The influence of nutritional and metabolic status on progression from asymptomatic HIV infection to AIDS-defining diagnosis, AIDS, 13(10), 1999, pp. 1221-1226
Background: Changes in body weight and lean tissue increase morbidity and m
ortality during AIDS; however there are few data on the effect of alteratio
ns in nutrition and metabolism on disease progression at earlier stages of
HIV infection.
Objectives: To assess whether change in weight, lean tissue or skeletal mus
cle affects progression to AIDS; to assess prospectively the effects of rec
ognized alterations in nutrition and metabolism in asymptomatic HIV-seropos
itive men on disease progression; and to examine prospectively changes in n
utrition and metabolism at AIDS-defining diagnosis.
Methods: A group of 104 asymptomatic HIV-seropositive men were recruited an
d prospectively examined at 3-monthly intervals between April 1993 and Sept
ember 1995. Nutritional status and metabolism were examined using indirect
calorimetry, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and urine excretion of simple
sugars. Time-fixed and time-dependent Cox's proportional hazard models wer
e fitted to calculate risks of developing a first AIDS diagnosis, weight lo
ss or death.
Results: During the study period, 31 subjects had a first AIDS diagnosis of
whom 26 were fully assessed. Changes in nutrition and metabolism do not af
fect disease progression in asymptomatic HIV infection. However, subjects w
ith a reduction in body weight and basal metabolic index tend to have a hig
her risk of progression to AIDS-defining diagnosis, independent of CD4 coun
t. There is a significant decrease in all body tissue compartments, a decre
ase in excretion of urinary sugars and significant increase in resting ener
gy expenditure and fat oxidation associated with a first AIDS diagnosis.
Conclusion: Change in metabolic and nutritional status at the asymptomatic
stage of HIV infection does not influence disease progression significantly
, although there is a trend suggesting weight loss has an independent effec
t on outcome. There is a cachectic response to AIDS-defining opportunistic
infection or tumour. (C) 1999 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.