One hundred and twenty ASA I and II grade children aged 3-9 years scheduled
for outpatient dental extractions under general anaesthesia were studied.
They were allocated randomly to one of three groups for airway management:
group R had anaesthesia with a reinforced laryngeal mask airway, group L wi
th a standard laryngeal mask airway and group N with a nasal mask. Anaesthe
sia was induced in all children using halothane in 50%; nitrous oxide with
oxygen and maintained on halothane in 67% nitrous oxide with oxygen, an Ayr
e's T-piece with Jackson-Rees modification was used. The incidence of airwa
y obstruction was significantly lower and surgical access significantly bet
ter with the reinforced laryngeal mask airway when compared with the standa
rd laryngeal mask airway. However, the reinforced laryngeal mask airway was
significantly more difficult to insert when compared with the standard lar
yngeal mask airway. On comparing the reinforced laryngeal mask airway with
the nasal mask, there were significantly; fewer episodes of airway obstruct
ion, better oxygen saturation, less increase in heart rate and fewer arrhyt
hmias in the reinforced laryngeal mask airway group. Total time for the pro
cedures was the same for all three groups. Thus, the reinforced laryngeal m
ask airway was found to be a favourable alternative to the standard larynge
al mask airway and nasal mask for paediatric outpatient dental extractions.