Jn. Alexander et al., Evaluation of automated isocratic and gradient nano-liquid chromatography and capillary electrochromatography, ANALYT CHEM, 71(13), 1999, pp. 2398-2409
An automated liquid nano-separation system has been developed for nano-liqu
id chromatography (nano-LC) and capillary electrochromatography (CEC) using
both isocratic and gradient elution, One fused-silica nanocolumn, typicall
y 75 mu m i.d. x 39 cm (25 cm effective packed length), packed with Spheris
orb ODS 1, 3 mu m particle size, can be used with either technique without
having to remove the column upon snitching from one mode to the other. The
mobile phase is delivered by two reciprocating micro-LC pumps at a now rate
of 30 mu L/min to a postinjection splitter that houses the nanocolumn inle
t. The splitter is directly connected to a micro-injection valve with a 0.5
mu L injection volume. In the CEC mode, pressure is not applied (no restri
ction on splitter) to the column inlet or outlet and the voltage is continu
ously applied during sample injection and mobile phase delivery, In the nan
o-LC mode, the restrictor is coupled to the splitter. Using the same nanoco
lumn under isocratic conditions, the repeatabilities of retention time and
peak area for nano-LC were better than 0.2% and 4%, respectively, and those
for CEC were better than 0.6% and 6%, respectively. On average, column eff
iciency was 57% higher in CEC compared to nano-LC. Gradient elution separat
ions of parabens and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were accompli
shed by CEC.