The first differentiation of enteric neurons into three morphological types
was done by the russian histologist A. S. Dogiel on the basis of the diffe
rent shapes and lengths of their dendrites. Although a number of au thors c
onsidered his results during the following decades, only a division into tw
o types withstood time: type I neurons had one long and several short proce
sses, whereas type II neurons were characterized by several long processes.
Some further structural features were disscussed but substantial progress
was not made until the 1970s. This stagnation was due to some inaccuracies
in Dogiel's descriptions, to the fact that most histologists in this field
followed the reticular concept of the nervous system, to the idea that ente
ric neurons represent no more than a vegetative, postganglionic relay stati
on between the central nervous system and the periphery, and to methodologi
cal difficulties. With the application of modern neuroanatomical techniques
it was realized that the enteric nervous system contains a considerable nu
mber of neuronal subpopulations. The search for morphological correlates of
the chemical diversity of enteric neurons was done mainly in the pig and t
he guinea-pig. In the pig, additional structural features such as axonal pr
ojection, distribution of neurons within ganglia, within different plexuses
and along the length of the gut, blood supply etc. were included as criter
ia for further refining neuronal classification. Most of our knowledge abou
t functional features of enteric neurons, e.g. chemical coding, neuronal co
nnectivity, electrophysiological behaviour, was derived from studies in the
guinea-pig small intestine. In light of interspecies differences, comparis
on of findings from different species is mandatory. The search for morpholo
gical and functional peculiarities of human enteric neuronal circuitry has
to consider all methodological and conceptual advances made within the past
100 years since the pioneering work of Dogiel.