Creation and testing of a practical visual function assessment for use in Africa: correlation with visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and near vision in Malawian adults
K. Van Dijk et al., Creation and testing of a practical visual function assessment for use in Africa: correlation with visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and near vision in Malawian adults, BR J OPHTH, 83(7), 1999, pp. 792-795
Aim-To develop and test a practical visual function assessment for use in d
eveloping countries.
Methods-Using focus group discussions and interviews with eyecare workers a
nd low vision specialists in Malawi, 13 questions related to visual charact
eristics of activities of daily living were designed. Patients presenting t
o an eye clinic were recruited and interviewed. Visual acuity, near vision,
and contrast sensitivity were measured. Analysis sought: to determine the
degree of correlation between the vision indices and visual function.
Results-The visual function questionnaire was easy to administer. Visual fu
nction correlated with visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, near vision, an
d patient reported visual problem. People with a higher frequency of "not a
pplicable" responses had lower visual function scores. Multivariate modelli
ng revealed that visual acuity and number of questions felt to be applicabl
e were independently associated with visual function. Reducing the question
naire to nine questions did not affect the degree of correlation with any o
f the visual indices.
Conclusion-The authors' visual function assessment correlates well with dif
ferent measures of visual acuity, People with reduced vision for a prolonge
d period may no longer consider doing certain tasks and the number of quest
ions considered appropriate by an individual may be an additional measure o
f visual function. Assessment of visual function by health workers may be a
valuable tool in improving surgical uptake by encouraging both health pers
onnel and patients to recognise that they have difficulties undertaking act
ivities of daily living as well as a measure of monitoring and evaluating c
ataract outcomes.